Abstract
Introduction: TAVI has increasingly become a viable treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at excessive surgical risk. Severe aortic stenosis is a condition that affects the general population, especially elderly individuals. Proper selection of patients is critical and requires imaging studies before percutaneous implant. Objective: with growing experience, our group has strengthen its pre-procedure assessment of anatomical valve annulus parameters, discrepancies have arisen in the measurements between the different imaging modalities used. We sought to validate and demonstrate the degree of correlation between these modalities and determine possible factors that might influence the results. Methods: between March 2008 and February 2012, a total of 81 consecutive patients underwent TAVI with the Medtronic-CoreValve System (MCS). All endpoints were defined in accordance with the Valve Academic Research Consortium recommendations. Fifty-eight patients had a MDCT done prior to implantation, but 53 patients (65%). The mean annulus diameter was calculated and compared between echo, MDCT (also included major and minor annulus diameters, and Agatston valve scoring) and angiographic measurements, and with the final size of the implanted valve. To address the learning curve issue, the group was divided: (a) the first early 40 TAVI cases (first 23 patients with MDCT performed), and (b) the second latest 41 patients (late 30 patients with MDCT). Results: aortic annulus diameter correlations were: low for TEE vs. MDCT (r=0,11; p<0,47); moderate for TEE vs angiography (r=0,337; p<0,018); moderate for MDCT vs. Angiography (r=0,365; p<0,009). No significant changes regarding the early or late subgroups by echo, but MDCT and angiography significantly increased from r=0,22 in the early group to r=0,70 (p<0,001) in the late group. Correlations with the valve size finally implanted (26 mms, 29 mms, or 31 mms) were: MDCT general (r=0,67; p<0,001),with first subgroup (r=0,65; p<0,001), and second subgroup (r=0.78; p<0,001); angiography general (r=0,50; p<0,005), with first subgroup (r=0,39; p<0,005), and second subgroup (r=0,60; p<0,004); and finally for TEE general (r=0,39; p<0,006), with first subgroup (r=0,41; p<0,03), and second subgroup (r=0,33; p<0,14). The Agatston median score was: for early subgroup 2627 U, for late subgroup 3058 U (p=0,108). The annulus difference between the major and minor diameters 4.5 cms in the early subgroup and 3.1 cms in the late subgroup (p=0,047). Conclusions: with growing experience in TAVI procedures, the working groups are demonstrating that MDCT should be preferred over other imaging modalities for valve sizing. This study clearly shows that there is a learning curve that strengthens MDCT´s reliability, although some geometric shape deformation of the aortic annulus could account for a less early correlation. Definitely, the calcium burden and its asymmetrical deformation should be no obstacle for an accurate assessment of the aortic valve annulus by MDCT.
References
Leon M, Smith C, Mack M, Miller D, Moses J, Svensson L, Tuzcu E, Webb J, Fontana G, Makkar R, Brown D, Block P, Guyton R, Pichard A, Bavaria J, Herrmann H, Douglas P, Petersen J, Akin J, Anderson W, Wang D, Pocock S, Investigators PT. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(17):1597-1607. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008232
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, Borenstein N, Tron C, Bauer F, Derumeaux G, Anselme F, Laborde F, Leon M. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002; 106(24):3006-3008. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000047200.36165.B8
Dager AE, Nuis RJ, Caicedo B, Fonseca J, Arana C, Cruz L, Benitez LM, Nader CA, Dueñas E, de Marchena E, O'Neill W, de Jaegere P. Clinical Results Of The Cali Colombian Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Medtronic CoreValve Registry. Tex Heart Inst J 2012; 39(3): 351-8.
Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, Linke A, Wenaweser P, SaurenB, Mohr F, Walther T, Zickmann B, Iversen S, Felderhoff T, Cartier R, Bonan R.Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patientsusing the second- and current third-generation selfexpanding CoreValve prosthesis:device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50(1):69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.047
Nuis RJ, Dager AE, van der Boon R, Jaimes MC, CaicedoB, Fonseca J, Van Mieghem NM, Benitez L, Umana JP, O'Neill W, de Marchena E, de Jaegere P. Patients with Aortic Stenosis Referred for TAVI: Treatment Decision, In-hospital Outcome and Determinants of Survival. Neth Heart J. 2012; in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.934
Buellesfeld L, Wenaweser P, Gerckens U, Mueller R, Sauren B, Latsios G, Zickmann B, Hellige G, Windecker S, Grube E. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictors of procedural success- -the Siegburg-Bern experience. Eur Heart J 2010; 31(8):984-991. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp570
Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, Blackstone EH, Cutlip DE, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Mack M, Mehran R, Miller C, Morel MA, Petersen J, Popma JJ, Takkenberg JJ, Vahanian A, van Es GA, Vranckx P, Webb JG, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials a consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57(3):253-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.005
Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Kaul S, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Document on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.084
Schiller N, Shah P, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two- Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2(5):358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(89)80014-8
Moss, RR, Ivens E, Sanjeevan P, Humphries K, Thompson CR, Munt B, Sinhal A, Webb JG. Role of Echocardiography in Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation. J Am coll Cardiol Img. 2008; 1: 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.09.004
Lepsic J, Gurvitch R, LaBounty TM, Min JK, Wood D, Johnson A, Ajlan AM, Wijesinghe N, Webb JG. J Am Coll cardiol Img. 2011; 4: 416-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.01.014
Schoenhagen P, Kapadia S, Halliburton S, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM. Computed Tomography Evaluation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Imaging f the Aortic Root and Iliac Arteries. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5(5): 239-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.04.007
Van der Boon, RM; Nuis, RJ; van Mieghem, N; Benitez, LM; van Geuns, RJ; Tjebbe, WG; van Domburg, RT; Serruys, PW; de Marchena, E; Geleijnse, ML; Dager, AE; de Jaegere, PPT. Clinical Outcome following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function. Cath Interv. 2012; in press. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23423
Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, Linke A, Sievert H, Eggebrecht H, Hambrecht R, Sack S, Hauptmann K, Richardt G, Figulla H, Senges J, Investigators obotGTAVIR. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq339
Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A, Petronio AS, Ettori F, Santoro G, Klugmann S, Bedogni F, Maisano F, Marzocchi A, Poli A, Antoniucci D, Napodano M, De Carlo M, Fiorina C, Ussia GP. Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2011; 123(3):299-308. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.946533
Eltchaninoff H, Prat A, Gilard M, Leguerrier A, Blanchard D, Fournial G, Iung B, Donzeau-Gouge P, Tribouilloy C, Debrux J, Pavie A, Gueret P, Investigators obotFR. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: early results of the FRANCE (FRench Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards) registry. Eur Heart J 2010.
Nuis R-J, Van Mieghem N, Van der Boon R, Van Geuns R-J, Schultz C, Oei F, Galema T, Bol Raap G, Koudstaal P, Geleijnse M, Kappetein AP, Serruys P, De Jaegere P. Effect of Experience on Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Medtronic CoreValve System. Am J Cardiol; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.315
Webb J, Pasupati S, Humphries K, Thompson C, Altwegg L, Moss R, Sinhal A, Carere R, Munt B, Ricci D, Ye J, Cheung A, Lichtenstein S. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2007; 116(7):755-763. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.698258
Thielmann M, Wendt D, Eggebrecht H, Kahlert P, Massoudy P, Kamler M, Erbel R, Jakob H, Sack S. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with very high risk for conventional aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88(5):1468-1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.033
Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW, Anderson RH. Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent. 2008;1:74-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.780858
Ng ACT, Delgado V, van der Kley F, Shanks M, van de Veire NRL, Bertini M, Nucifora G, van Bommel RJ, Tops LF, de Weger A , Tavilla G, de Roos A, Kroft LJ, Leung DJ, Schuijf J, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Comparison of Aortic Root Dimensions and Geometries Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by 2- and 3 Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography and Multislice Computed Tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:94-102. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152
Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E, Ducrocq G, Lepage L, Detaint D, Hyafil F, Himbert D, Pasi N, Laissy JP, Iung B, Vahanian A. Multimodal Assessment of the Aortic Annulus DiameterImplications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:186-94." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.063