Palabras clave
Endovascular
Aneurisma
Endofugas Aorta
Endovascular
Aneurysm
Endoleaks
Cómo citar
Resumen
El aneurisma de la aorta abdominal se define como una dilatación igual o mayor de 3 cm. en el diametro transverso o anteroposterior, que comprende las tres capas de la pared arterial. Los aneurismas de la aorta abdominal se encuentran en el 2 al 4% de la población mayor de 50 años, con edad media en el momento del diagnóstico de 65 a 70 años y mayor prevalencia en hombres. Se asocian a enfermedad coronaria, enfermedad vascular periférica y a historia familiar de aneurismas. Dependiendo, entre otros criterios, de las características imagenológicas del aneurisma, se trata de forma quirúrgica abierta o endovascular. Es por ello que en la práctica diaria el radiólogo debe conocer y describir en forma adecuada los aneurismas en la tomografía previa al tratamiento y además reconocer las complicaciones más frecuentes una vez han recibido manejo con endoprótesis, ya que algunas de ellas requieren reintervención urgente.
Citas
Dmitry Rakita , Amit Newatia , John J. Hines. Spectrum of CT Findings in Rupture and Impending Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:497-507. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.272065026
Jonas Rydberg, Kenyon K. Kopecky, Matthew S. Johnson. Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Assessment with Multislice CT. AJR 2001;177:607-614 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770607
Mustafa R. Bashir, Hector Ferral, Chad Jacobs. opacificaEndoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Management Strategies According to CT Findings. AJR 2009; 192:W178-W186. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1593
Toshifumi Mita, Takeshi Arita, Naofumi Matsunaga. Complications of Endovascular Repair for Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Imaging Spectrum. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1263-1278. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se161263
J. J. Wever, J. D. Blankensteijn, J. C. van Rijn. Inter- and Intraobserver Variability of CT Measurements Obtained After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. AJR 2000; 175:1279-1282. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.5.1751279
Quan D. M. Vu, Christine O. Menias, Sanjeev Bhalla. Aortoenteric Fistulas: CT Features and Potential Mimics. RadioGraphics 2009; 29:197-209. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.291075185
Timothy A. M. Chuter, Roy L. Gordon, Linda M. Reilly. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in High-Risk Patients:Short- to Intermediate-term Results of Endovascular Repair. Radiology 1999; 210:361-365. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99ja37361
Donald F. Orton, Robert F. LeVeen, Jean A. Saigh, Aortic Prosthetic Graft Infections: Radiologic Manifestations and Implications for Management. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:977-993. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl12977
Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991; 5:491-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015271
Dake, Miller DC, Semba CP, Mitchell RS,. Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1729-1734. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199412293312601
Brewster DC, Geller SC, Kaufman JA, et al. Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:992-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70002-3
Cronenwett JL, Krupski WC, Rutherford RB. Abdominal aortic and iliac aneurysms. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2000:1246-1280.
White GH, Yu W, May J. Endoleak: a proposed new terminology to describe incomplete aneurysm exclusion by an endoluminal graft. J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3:124-125. https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0124b:>2.0.CO;2
Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 2007; 243:641-655 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2433051649
Tolia AJ, Landis R, Lamparello P, Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: natural history. Radiology 2005; 235:683-686. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352040649
Stavropoulos SW, Clark TW, Carpenter JP, et al. Use of CT angiography to classify endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:663-667. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000152386.97448.F1
Napoli V, Bargelli I, Sardella SG, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: contrastenhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair. Radiology 2004; 233:217-225. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331031767
Gorich J, Rilinger N, Sokiranski R, et al. Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography. Radiology 1999; 213:767-772. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc04767
Scott RA, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4,237 screened patients: prevalence, development and management over 6 years. Br J Surg 1991;78:1122-1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780929
Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D, Sternby NH. Increasing prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a necropsy study. Eur J Surg 1992;158:19 -23.
Siegel CL, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Alpern MB, Courneya DL, Leder RA. Abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology: CT features in patients with ruptured and non-ruptured aneurysms. AJR 1994;163:1123-1129. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976888
Maher MM, McNamara AM, MacEneaney PM, Sheehan SJ, Malone DE. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: elective endovascular repair versus conventional surgery- evaluation with evidencebased medicine techniques. Radiology 2003;228: 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283012185
Remy-Jardin M, Dequiedt P, Ertzbischoff O, et al. Safety and effectiveness of gadolinium-enhanced multi-detector row spiral CT angiography of the chest: preliminary results in 37 patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents. Radiology 2005;235:819 - 826. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040734
Wicky S, Greenfield A, Fan CM, et al. Aortoiliac gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography: improved results with a 16-detector row scanner compared with a four detector row scanner. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15(9):947-954. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000130381.73361.7A
Thomsen HS. Guidelines for contrast media from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1463-1471. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811463