Abstract
Introduction: tunnel creation and corneal ring segments implantation requires great manual ability and precise, flexible instruments. Purpose: to publicize the design of a new mechanical dissector for the implementation of intrastromal ring segments and a new vacuum ring to hold the eyeball during surgery. Methods: taking into account the procedure to be perform as well as geometric and ergonomic considerations, a new mechanical dissector was designed whose geometric and rotation center coincided with the center of the cornea to be treated. At each end of the instrument a tunneler was installed, one clockwise and the other counterclockwise. A vacuum system was adapted to the new clamping ring to immobilize the eye, without obstructing the surgeon’s field of view. Results: the handling and rotation of tunneler is done properly and accurately, with only one hand. This new design allows applying torque evenly when creating the intrastromal tunnel. The field of view of the cornea surface to be treated is much greater. Once the eyeball is attached with the new clamping ring, the patient feels more comfortable and the surgeon can proceed more safely. This ring does not create tension on the surface of the cornea. Conclusions: both the new tunneler and the new clamping ring are innovative contributions to current surgical instruments. These new tools facilitate the surgeon to insert intrastromal rings more easily and more safely, with greater patient comfort.
References
Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, Malet F. Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:1117-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00451-X
Alio JL, Shabayek MH, Artola A. Intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus correction: long-term followup. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:978-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.044
Coskunseven E, Kymionis G, Tsiklis N, Atun S. Complications of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation using a femtosecond laser for channel creation: a survey of 850 eyes with keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2011; 89:54-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01605.x
Zare MA, Hashemi H, Salari MR. Intracorneal ring segment implantation for the management of keratoconus: safety and efficacy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:1886-1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.055
Kubaloglu A, Sogutlu E, Cinar Y, Koytak A. Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for the treatment of keratoconus. Cornea 2011 Jan; 30(1):11-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e2cf57
Shabayek MH, Alió JL. Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation by femtosecond laser for keratoconus correction. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:1643- 1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.033
Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Cinar Y, Cingu K, Koytak A, Coskun E, et al. Comparison of mechanical and femtosecond laser tunnel creation for intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:1556-1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.04.028
Jaboc S, Nair V, Prakash G, Kumar DA, Agarwal A. Turnaround technique for instrastromal corneal ring implantation in eye with false channel dissection. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:1253-1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.002
Pietrini D, Guedj T. Corneal remodeling using the keraring. Cataract Refract Surg Today Europe. 2009 Oct;16-22.
Piñero D, Alio J, Uceda-Montañes A, El Kady B, Pascual I. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in corneas with post-Laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia. Ophthalmology 2009; 116:1665-1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.030
Strasser H. Assessment of the ergonomic quality of hand-held tools and computer input devices. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2007. 283 p.