Diagnostic precision of coronary angiotomography of 64 slices in the assessment of symptomatic patients after going to myocardial revascularization, a comparative study with conventional coronary angiograpy
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Tomografía computada multicortes
Angiografía coronaria
Estenosis
Puentes venosos y arteriales
Arterias coronarias Multislice computed tomography
Coronary angiography
Stenoses
Venous and arterial bypasses
Coronary arteries

How to Cite

Muñoz, J. S., & Villani, . A. (2009). Diagnostic precision of coronary angiotomography of 64 slices in the assessment of symptomatic patients after going to myocardial revascularization, a comparative study with conventional coronary angiograpy. Revista Médica Sanitas, 12(4), 16-24. Retrieved from //revistas.unisanitas.edu.co/index.php/rms/article/view/208

Abstract

Conventional coronary angiograpy is still considered the standard method for assessment of obstructions in aorto coronarious grafts, as well as for native coronary arteries. Nevertheless new generations of multislice computed tomography (MCT) have shown accuracy for identification of permeability of coronarial bypasses as well as for the assessment of native coronary arteries which receive distal anastomoses. Objectives: our aim was to assess operative properties of MCT obtained from 64 slices of symptomatic patients who were taken to myocardial revascularization. Methodology and results: coronary angiography by MCT of 64 detectors was performed in 92 symptomatic patients, 9.3±7.8 years after myocardic revascularization. 56 patients (61%) had gone to at least one ischemic inductor test at the beginning of symptoms. 92% of patients were also taken to conventional coronary angiography within days 16.9±9,1 after MCT. Only segments which presented angiographic confirmation were analyzed by two independent observers, resulting in an analysis of 201 coronary bypasses (77 arterial bypasses and 124 venous bypasses), with a total of 603 analyzed segments (231 arterial, 372 venous). Also 200 segments correspondent to distal runoff segments and 140 native coronaries were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value and negative predictive value of coronary angiography by MCT for the detection of significant obstructions (stenoses or total occlusions) for all bypasses was of 98%, 98.6%, 96.5% y 99.3%, respectively. In relationship to segments (proximal, medial and distal) of each bypass (arterial and venous) a sensitivity of 98.6% was reported with an specificity of 99%. The presence of obstructive lesions was significantly higher in revascularizated distal segments than in coronary bypasses (39%[78/200] vs. 28%[56/201]; p=0,026). In relation to native coronary arteries, a total of 140 were assessed (420 coronary segments) resulting in a predictive positive value of 67% and a specificity of 86%. This in relation to the over estimation of severity of lesions, which was shown by the presence of 15 false positive and one false negative. Conclusions: results shown by our study suggest that obstructive disease of coronary bypasses can be detected with a high diagnostic accuracy by using coronary angiograpy of 64 slices in a selected population.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Gobel FL, Stewart WJ, Campeau L, et al. Safety of coronary arteriography in clinically stable patients following coronary bypass surgery: Post CABG Trial Investigators. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;45: 376-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199812)45:4<376::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO;2-X

Stein PD, Beemath A, Skaf E, et al. Usefulness of 4-,8- and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96:1669-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.089

Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 2003;229:749-756. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2293020856

Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, Tomassini M, Razzini C, Sperandio M, Simonetti G, Romeo F, Mehta JL. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110:3234-3238. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000147277.52036.07

Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kuhl H, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J. Non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16¬detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1224-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.075

Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, Bonomo L. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1353-1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2323-3

Salm LP, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Schuijf JD, Vliegen HW, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 2005;150:775-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.029

Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006;114:2334-2341. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631051

Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, et al. Improved non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:946-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.066

Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L, et al. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 2007;99: 1529- 1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.026

Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.51.4.5

Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, Foell D, Ghanem N, Kotter E, Geibel-Zehender A, Bode C, Langer M, Bley T. Initial experience with 64¬slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 2006;27:976- 980. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi824

Bourassa MG, Fisher LD, Campeau L, Gillespie MJ, McConney M, Lesperance J. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation 1985;72(6 pt 2):V71-V78.

Salm LP, Bax JJ, Jukema W, et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detectorrow computed tomography. Am Heart J 2005; 150:775-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.029

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.