Diagnostic consistency between tomosynthesis and biopsy in women with suspicious breast cancer lesions
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Tomosíntesis
Cáncer de mama
Neoplasia de mama
Biopsia
Mamografía Tomosynthesis
Breast cancer
Breast neoplasm
Biopsy
Mammography

How to Cite

González Encinales, M. C. ., Rodríguez, R. ., Atuesta Tavera , Ángela M. ., & Rodríguez Suescun, D. (2016). Diagnostic consistency between tomosynthesis and biopsy in women with suspicious breast cancer lesions. Revista Médica Sanitas, 19(1), 24-35. Retrieved from //revistas.unisanitas.edu.co/index.php/rms/article/view/464

Abstract

ammography is low. Nowadays, tomosynthesis is an additional tool available besides mammography, however there is limited national evidence regarding the diagnostic consistency between tomosynthesis and breast biopsy. Objectives: To estimate the consistency between tomosynthesis and breast biopsy in adult women with suspicious cancer lesions. Methodology: Retrospective, diagnostic concordance trial. Results: The principal group with biopsy-confirmed suspicious malignant breast lesions was between 50 and 60 years of age. The most frequent diagnoses with tomosynthesis were: nodules (27.5%) and microcalcifications (21.9%). With biopsy, 21.25% of the women had a diagnosis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma. BI-RADS 4 category was reported in 86% of the cases. The Kappa coefficient was of 0.406 (p<0.001) with tomosynthesis and biopsy in patients with suspicious lesions of the breast. The sensitivity and specificity was: 84% (95% CI 71.5% - 91.7%) and 63.6% (95% CI 54.3% - 72.0%) with positive and negative predictive values of 51.2% (95% CI 40.6% - 61.7%) and 89.7% (95% CI 81.0% - 94.7%) respectively. The mean radiation dose used was 7.9 mGy. Conclusions: There is moderate consistency between
tomosynthesis and the histopathological study of the breast. Tomosynthesis shows good sensitivity and acceptable specificity in the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Taype M. Valores de compresión aplicados en un examen de mamografía y su relación con la dosis de radiación en pacientes de 40-60 años. Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo. Enero-Marzo 2013 [Tesis de grado]. Lima (Perú): Universidad Nacional Mayor de San marcos; 2013. Disponible en http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/cybertesis/2838

Control de calidad en mamografía [monografía en internet]. Guía práctica; Xunta de galicia consellería de sanidade e servicios sociais; 2000 [consultado 26 de abril de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.sergas.es/cas/Publicaciones/Docs/SaludPublica/PDF10-133.pdf

Horvath E. Mamografía en la era digital. Revista Chilena de Radiología [Editorial]. 2008 [citado 2015 abril 28]; 14(3): 111. Disponible en http:// www.scielo.cl/pdf/rchradiol/v14n3/art01.pdf https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-93082008000300001

Dobbins JT. Tomosynthesis imaging: At a translational crossroads. Medical Physics [internet]. 2009 [citado 2015 abril 30]; 36(6): 1956-1967. Disponible en http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2832060/. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3120285

Baker JA, Lo JY. Breast Tomosynthesis: state of the art and review of the literature. Academic Radiology [internet]. 2011 [citado 2015 abril 29]; 18:1298-1310. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.06.011

Tomosíntesis, un gran avance diagnóstico que podría remplazar a la mamografía en cribado. Revista de Senología y Patología mamaria [Editorial]. 2015 [citado 2015 abril 28]; 28(1): 1-2. Disponible en http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=90376528&pident_ usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=131&ty=121&accion=L&origen=zonadelectura&web=www.elsevier.es&lan=es&fichero=131v28n01a 90376528pdf001.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.senol.2014.11.002

Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, et al. Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration. European Radiology [internet]. 2013 [citado 2015 abril 28]; 23:2061-2071. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701792/ pdf/330_2013_Article_2820.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2820-3

Dobbins JT, McAdams HP. Chest tomosynthesis: Technical principles and clinical update. European Journal of Radiology [internet]. 2009 [citado 2015 abril 29]; 72(2):244-251. Disponible en http://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(09)00356-8/abstract https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.054

Elizalde A. Tomosíntesis mamaria: bases físicas, indicaciones y resultados. Revista de Senología y Patología Mamaria [internet]. 2015 [citado 2015 abril 28]; 28(1): 39-45. Disponible en http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=90376534&pident_ usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=131&ty=127&accion=L&origen=zonadelectura&web=www.elsevier.es&lan=es&fichero=131v28n01 a90376534pdf001.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.senol.2014.10.004

Instituto de efectividad clínica sanitaria [monografía en internet]. Tomosíntesis digital para el diagnóstico de patología mamaria; 2013 [consultado 26 de abril de 2015]. Disponible en http://www.iecs.org.ar/iecs-frame-visor-publicaciones.php?cod_publicacion=1552&origen_ publicacion=publicaciones

Rafferty EA. Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiologic Clinics of North America [internet]. 2007 [citado 2015 junio 1]; 45:831-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.005

Palazuelos G, Trujillo S, Romero J. Tomosíntesis: la nueva era de la mamografía. Revista Colombiana de Radiología [internet]. 2014 [citado 2015 mayo 4]; 25(2):3926-3933. Disponible en http://www.acronline.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=VycNoBWx0rE%3D&tabid=1499

Sechopoulos I. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. Medical Physics [internet]. 2013 [citado 2015 junio1]; 40:014301. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4770279

Zhi H, Ou B, Luo BM, Feng X, Wen YL, Yang HY. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine [internet]. 2007 [citado 2015 junio 1]; 26:807-15. Disponible en http://www.jultrasoundmed. org/content/26/6/807.long https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2007.26.6.807

Baker JA, Lo JY. Breast tomosynthesis: state-of the-art and review of the literature. Academic Radiology 2011; 18:1298-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.06.011

Martí J, Oliver A, Freixenet J, Martí R. Digital mammography [internet]. Girona (Spain): Springer Science & Business Media; 2010. [citado 2015 abril 29]. Disponible en https://books.google.com.co/books?id=X_zweznoyfMC&dq=Spiculated+lesions+and+architectural+distortions+detection+in+Digital+breast+tomosynthesis+datasets.&hl=es&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.