Keywords
ecografía
Resonancia magnética
cáncer de mama
histología Mammography
Ultrasound
Magnetic Resonance
breast cancer
histology
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer represents the first cause of death from cancer worldwide, so an accurate imaging diagnosis significantly modifies the prognosis. Objective: In this research, the findings by mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were characterized, according to the histopathological type of breast cancer in female patients from the city of Bogotá, Colombia, during the period 2013 - 2018; Materials and method: a descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in patients with breast cancer confirmed by biopsy and with images available in the institutional storage system, which were interpreted with the lexicon of BI-RADS®. Results: In a total of 83 patients, with a mean age of 54.43 years, most of whom were overweight or obese and/or had a family history of breast cancer, the most frequent histological type was infiltrating ductal carcinoma, which presented as a single nodule. , irregular, non-circumscribed margins, hypoechoic on ultrasound, with posterior acoustic shadow and associated with microcalcifications in 27% of cases, similar to infiltrating lobular carcinoma, which, in addition, is associated with axillary lymphadenopathy in 50%; for the ductal in situ subtype, the most frequent presentation was grouped and/or segmental microcalcifications with suspicious morphology.
References
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics. Cancer Journal Clinical 65(2). 2015. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262
Mainiero, M. B., Lourenco, A., Mahoney, M. C., Newell, M. S., Bailey, L., Barke, L. D., Haffty, B. G. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 13(11). 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.021
Global cancer observatory (GLOBOCAN), Cancer Today, Estimated age-standardized incidence rates (Colombia), female, all ages, 2015–2020, WHO.
De Lemos LLP, Carvalho de Souza M, Pena Moreira D, Ribeiro Fernandes Almeida, Godman B, Verguet S, et al. Stage at diagnosis and stage-specific survival of breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019.14 (10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224012
Richardson LC, Henley SJ, Miller JW, Massetti G, Thomas CC. Patterns and Trends in Age-Specific Black-White Differences in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality–United States, 1999-2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016. 65(40):1093. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6540a1
Han X, Stevens J, Truesdale KP, Bradshaw PT, Kucharska-Newton A, Prizment AE, Platz EA, Joshu CE. Body mass index at early adulthood, subsequent weight change and cancer incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer; 2014. 135 (12):2900-2909. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28930
Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K, International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016. 375(8):794. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1606602
Ahlgren M, Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Sørensen TI. Growth patterns and the risk of breast cancer in women. N Engl J Med. 2004. 351(16):1619. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040576
What Are the Risk Factors for Breast Cancer? Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Consultado el 27 de Julio de 2022. Disponible a través de la página Web: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/risk_factors.htm#:~:text=A%20woman's%20risk%20for%20breast,also%20raises%20a%20woman's%20risk
Gershuni, Victoria & Ahima, Rexford & Tchou, Julia. Obesity and Breast Cancer: A Complex Relationship. Current Surgery Reports. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-016-0134-5
Wang, A. T., Vachon, C. M., Brandt, K. R., & Ghosh, K. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk: A Practical Review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 89(4), 2014, 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.12.014
Allred DC. Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2010:2134. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq035
Pinder SE, Duggan C, Ellis IO, et al. A new pathological system for grading DCIS with improved prediction of local recurrence: results from the UKCCCR/ANZ DCIS trial. Br J Cancer; 103:194. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605718
Gautam K. Malhotra, Xiangshan Zhao, Hamid Band & Vimla Band. Histological, molecular and functional subtypes of breast cancers; Cancer Biology & Therapy. 10:10, 955-960. 2010. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.10.10.13879
Yiqun Han, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu, Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer with special histological types: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis, The Breast,Volume 54, 2020, Pages 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.006
Shapiko S. Screening: assessment of current studies. Cancer Supplemment. 1994; 74: 231-23.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.2820741306
Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L. Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology. 2019 Sep;292(3):520-536. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182947. Epub 2019 Jul 30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182947
American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Breast Cancer Screening. Revisado en 2017.
Blaichman J, Marcus JC, Alsaadi T, El-Khoury M, Meterissian S, Mesurolle B. Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7374
Shan-Shan Sun, Bin Zhang, Hong-Meng Zhao, Xu-Chen Cao. Association between mammographic features and clinicopathological characteristics in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast cancer. Molecular and clinical oncology 2: 623-629, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.297
Alaref A, Hassan A, Sharma Kandel R, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Different Types of Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Cureus 13(3). Marzo, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13854
Gupta K, Kumaresan M, Venkatesan B, Chandra T, Patil A, Menon M. Sonographic features of invasive ductal breast carcinomas predictive of malignancy grade. Indian J Radiol Imaging; 28(1):123-131. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_257_17
D'Orsi CJ. Imaging for the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):214-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq037
Li JK, Wang HF, He Y, Huang Y, Liu G, Wang ZL. Ultrasonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 219 lesions. Gland Surg. 2020 Dec;9(6):1945-1954. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-428
Tajima CC, de Sousa LLC, Venys GL, Guatelli CS, Bitencourt AGV, Marques EF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: role in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiol Bras. 2019 Jan-Feb;52(1):43-47. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0058
Aluja Jaramillo, Felipe; González Encinares, Martha; Rodríguez, Ricardo. Carcinoma lobular infiltrante de mama para el radiólogo general: Revisión de imágenes. Rev. Colombiana de radiología; 27(1): 4387-4392, 2017.
González E. Martha; Dávila V. Claudia; Juan S. Isaac; Vieira S. Santiago; Estrada O. Kelly; Indicaciones de resonancia magnética en cáncer de mama: perspectivas futuras. Revista de la federación ecuatoriana de radiología e imagen. Volumen 1, N°1. Julio 2019.